Campus

Lt. Choi pleads for help to end policy prohibiting open homosexuality

Story Image

Stephanie Kuzydym | IDS

Lt. Dan Choi speaks on the issues of civil rights and equality in the Army under the "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" policy Monday at the Whittenberger Auditorium. Choi explained his decision to come out came from spending his whole life hiding a secret before eventually finding love.

POSTED AT 12:26 AM ON Nov. 3, 2009 | PRINT | Email | SHARE | COMMENTS (10)

The “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” policy had it’s own place in Lt. Dan Choi’s home. After telling his sister he was gay, she told Choi maybe he should wait to tell their parents. Maybe until they die.

“I told my mom because she was so annoying,” Choi said. “Literally, she asked me every five minutes, ‘When you marry Korean girl?’ She would say, ‘What do you want for breakfast? When you marry Korean girl?’”

When he finally told his mother, she took his hand in hers and said, “I love you, but gay is not real. I don’t know any gay people, especially no Korean gay people.”

Choi spoke about his recent notice of discharge from the army because of his sexual orientation Monday in the Whittenberger Auditorium.

Choi, a graduate from West Point Military Academy and Iraq War veteran, announced on national TV in March that he is gay. Choi served under the “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” policy for 10 years before officially coming out.

Now, he and other West Point graduates are spearheading a movement to end the controversial policy, which prohibits service members from being openly homosexual or bisexual.

Choi began by reciting an Arabic poem before explaining what it was like to come out to his parents.

During a question-and-answer session at the end, Choi said President Barack Obama should use his executive power to repeal the policy because voters elected him to be a leader, not to get re-elected.

Hannah Kinkead, public relations committee director for Union Board, said members of the Asian Cultural Center brought Choi to the board’s attention.

The center was interested in bringing Choi to IU, she said, not only to represent the Asian community but also the gay community in Bloomington.

On June 28, Choi said he received notice that he was to be discharged.

“The military is still in the closet about what they’re going to do with me,” he said. “I’m still waiting on what kind of discharge. It’s possible it could be anywhere from honorable to dishonorable discharge, but I’ve heard honorable.”

Choi said he made the decision to come out when he fell in love for the first time after returning from Iraq.

“I understood the world, and it made me a better person,” he said. “Why should I lie about that?”

After being asked repeatedly by friends in his unit to meet his mysterious girlfriend, Choi said he decided to tell them the truth.

“They said they never would have told, but they deserve to know,” he said. “At West Point, before you do a single push-up, you learn in the honor code that you never lie.”

Freshman Kyle Thompson said he heard of Choi’s story before and that he gives a
good presentation.

“It’s something I’m passionate about,” he said. “I definitely think the ‘Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell’ policy should be repealed. America is supposed to be the land of the free. If we can’t allow people in the army based on sexual orientation, we’re not following through with that promise.”

Choi said there is a call for action from university students and members of each community.

During his talk, Choi asked every member of the audience to take out their cell phones and type in the number to Congressman Baron Hill’s office. A sweet, old lady will answer the phone, he said.

“All you have to say is ‘Hi, my name is Dan, and I want you to repeal the ‘Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell’ policy,’” he said. “And that’s all you have to do. Call your senators every day and remind them we are their boss.”

To make his point, Choi called Hill’s office, holding his phone up to the speaker. The secretary’s voice rang through the phone, asking the caller to leave a name and number.

“I’m here at Indiana University,” Choi said into the phone, “and we all want you to repeal the ‘Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell’ policy.”

Choi held out the phone to audience members, who erupted in cheers.

PRINT | Email | SHARE | COMMENTS (10)





Name: *
Email: *
E-mail address will not be published.
Comments:
Verify image: Security Text
  *
 
 
All Comments  (10)

Posted by Linda Zambanini at 8:47 PM on Nov 04, 2009 | Report this comment

@Lindsey....if you aren't capable of reading my posts in which i explicitly described what terms are offensive and WHY then i'm sure nothing i could say would make you understand. There are some people who just don't want to understand.

Posted by Lindsey at 12:3 PM on Nov 04, 2009 | Report this comment

So people need to be made aware of what should offend them? Because my friends are from timid.

Posted by Linda Zambanini at 1:48 AM on Nov 04, 2009 | Report this comment

In addition to the last post regarding the offensiveness of the headline to LGBT people. The AP Styleguide from 2006 states: "Gay: ...Preferred over homosexual *except* in clinical contexts or references to sexual activity." Use of the word "homosexuality" as in the phrase "open homosexuality" in the headline is even *more* offensive as it unambiguously implies sexual *activity* - and in no way can refer to a state of being (as could possibly - but still poorly - be conveyed by the term "homosexual") @ Lindsey: regarding the term "Straight". "Straight" and "Gay" are not offensive terms in any way - they refer the the whole person not just their sexual behavior. Whereas, the terms "homosexual" and "heterosexual" tend to reduce the person to their sexuality and are used in medical/clinical settings such as sex research to define sexual behaviors. MOST LGBT people feel the term "homosexual" is extremely outdated and offensive in the same way Black people feel "colored" is offensive. If you have Gay friends, as you say, who are not offended by that term then they have have either not yet had their consciousnesses raised; or they have internalized homophobia that they are not aware of; or you have used the term in their presence and they have been too timid to point out the offense.

Posted by Lindsey at 12:17 AM on Nov 04, 2009 | Report this comment

I have a very good friend who is gay. I accept him for who he is. I have no problem with gay people whatsoever. The "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" policy, though, does not say that gay people cannot serve in the military. It says that gay people need to keep their sexual orientation to themselves, and this policy is not a result of people who want to discriminate against gay people. The military necessitates an intimacy among servicemembers that cannot have inhibitions. When sexuality is put into play, this intimacy is broken by inhibition. (Note: I am not saying homosexuals are more sexually promiscuous than heterosexuals. I am simply saying that knowing that a fellow serviceman is a homosexual can be uncomfortable for other servicemen. I would not feel comfortable sleeping and showering with people who may be sexually interested in me.) In addition to maintaing a brotherly relationship, the policy is in part for the safety of any homosexual servicemen. Terrible crimes have been committed against gay men in the armed forces. Just because these crimes are illegal does not mean it is dafe to be openly gay in the military. The policy does not require that all servicemembers be straight; it requires that their sexuality is kept to themselves. Additionally, Linda, if you are so offended by the term "homosexual" (which my own gay friends have no problem with,) why should I not be offended by your label of "straight?" I am more than my sexual orientation!

Posted by Linda Zambanini at 9:30 PM on Nov 03, 2009 | Report this comment

To the Author and the IDS: I was totally taken aback by the title you chose for the article: "Lt. Choi pleads for help to end policy prohibiting open homosexuality". Rather the title should read: Lt. Choi pleads for help to end policy prohibiting openly Gay and Lesbian Service members". I'll give you the benefit of the doubt. You are no doubt young compared to me (I'm 53 and I have been "out" since 1975) and maybe you aren't aware of how offensive your title you chose is. A little consciousness raising may be order. For the last 2 1/2 decades or more, the terms "homosexual" and "homosexuality" have been considered to be as outdated and offensive to LGBT people as the terms "colored" (or worse!) are to African-Americans. For decades these terms were used by the medical/psychiatric community and society at large to reduce LGBT people to a medical/psychiatric diagnosis of a perverse sexual "disease"- with no intimacy, commitment, love or caring attached. And these terms are still purposely and universally used by fundamentalist Christians who are intent on "curing" us in order to denigrate us, reduce us to our sexuality, and take away our humanity. You'll notice for example in the current Maine marriage equality referendum battle that the YES ON 1 groups (i.e.: those who want to take away the right for same-sex couples to be married) never use the words "Gay" or "Lesbian" - only "homosexual" and "homosexual sex". Like Straight people, we are much, much more than our sexuality. I call upon you and the IDS to retract this offensive title and apologize to the LGBT community and to Lt Dan Choi. IU is the home of the Kinsey Institute - we are better and more progressive than this.

Posted by Mark at 4:4 PM on Nov 03, 2009 | Report this comment

Choi's speech was fantastic. Thank you for bringing him to IU.

Posted by Patriot at 10:2 AM on Nov 03, 2009 | Report this comment

The neo-Nazi "Don't raus don't schnell" policy is a blight on our nation. It's time we actually acted on our ideals of freedom and equality instead of just paying them lip service. The bigots, racists, homophobes, and other ignoramuses are free to live in our country, but us true Americans certainly shouldn't let them set our policies.

Posted by Bob Is Sad at 9:6 AM on Nov 03, 2009 | Report this comment

If the President has no say, how did Clinton sign the FEDERAL LAW that outlines DADT? Estimates of the cost to replace officers removed because of DADT runs between $190.5 and $363 MILLION dollars. Of the 26 nations that partcipate militarily in NATO, 22 allow gays to serve. Of the permanent members of the UN Security council, only us, Russia, and China don't allow gays to serve in the military...I wouldn't be proud of the company we keep.

Posted by Park Ranger at 8:53 AM on Nov 03, 2009 | Report this comment

Bob, no where in the Uniform Code of Military Justice does it say it's illegal for Uniformed men/women to be gay. Homosexuality is not a behavior, it's not a condition, it's not a choice. If homosexuality is so illegal, then maybe hetereosexuals better stop procreating.

Posted by Bob at 4:55 AM on Nov 03, 2009 | Report this comment

The President can not eliminate the ban on homosexual behavior in the military. The Uniform Code of Military Justice makes that behavior illegal. Is homosexuality a behavior or is it a condition? A Lt for 10 years? He has other issue with the military besides his homosexuality.


Email

Your Name: *
Your Email: *  
To Email: *  
Subject: IDSnews.com | Lt. Choi pleads for help to end policy prohibiting open homosexuality
Comments:
Verify image: Security Text



*