Commentary

Capitol change

POSTED AT 11:03 PM ON Nov. 5, 2009 | PRINT | Email | SHARE | COMMENTS (6)

As I have stated before, I like to torture myself often. Part of me torturing myself includes watching Glenn Beck every day at 5 p.m. on Fox News.

For the most part, I think the guy is a raging lunatic. Normally what he says gets no response out of me. But last Thursday, his show prompted me to respond.

On a segment of his show called “Refounding America,” he accused President Obama and others associated with him and his administration of being revolutionaries who are trying to stamp out free speech, grow our government into either a communist or socialist government and bring an end to the free market as we know it. He went on to make comparisons between the founding father “revolutionaries” and the modern “revolutionaries,” saying that the founding fathers had the interest of all in mind and that today’s “revolutionaries” only have special interests in mind.

Again, Glenn Beck’s rants usually doesn’t provoke a response from me, but this one did. Ever since the Lehman Brothers collapsed last summer, we have turned on the television and read newspapers to hear story after story of corporate corruption, million-dollar scams and people legally being screwed out of savings and homes that they have earned by working hard for years. All of these things have occurred under a capitalist society. I will not say that it is a true free market society, but it is a capitalist society.

One can sit back and blame all of this on the deregulation of the Bush administration or blame it on special interests or say that what Obama is doing with all the efforts to control or regulate the market is worse than what we had before. For the sake of this article I don’t really care where you rest. But I do care if you have a mind that is capable of thinking outside of the box that we have been trained to think in since elementary school. Because if you can, I challenge all of you to think of something more.

I do not believe that Obama is trying to destroy capitalism or the free market, as Glenn Beck suggests. I firmly believe he is trying to preserve the market as it has been. He is trying to heal the market. My issue is that maybe that is the problem. Whether the market is regulated or deregulated, the disenfranchised continue to be ignored.

Speaking of the Declaration of Independence, if we have inalienable rights to “Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness,” shouldn’t the pursuit of happiness be a pursuit of all and not just of individuals? Should it not be a society where all have an EQUAL chance to obtain equality? I understand and agree to some extent with the laissez-faire idea that inequality of some sort promotes competition, which is good.

But the market of today has made it useless for millions to begin the pursuit to better themselves because not only will they not achieve their American dream, they barely make it out of their American nightmare. Whatever you think of capitalism, free market, socialism or laissez-faire, we need an economy where everyone has a chance to crash and burn, not just burn.

PRINT | Email | SHARE | COMMENTS (6)





Name: *
Email: *
E-mail address will not be published.
Comments:
Verify image: Security Text
  *
 
 
All Comments  (6)

Posted by TheLibertarian at 11:49 PM on Nov 08, 2009 | Report this comment

While I'm not happy with the recent activity the Democrats have been up to, I have to blame the Republican party for squabbling over insignificant details and promoting its more radical agenda. The Libertarian Party is what the Republican Party should have been.

Posted by AntiNeoFascist at 5:54 PM on Nov 06, 2009 | Report this comment

@mandyAmanda: You need to look into libertarianism. Up to the point of hatred at the working class, you're on the right track. Libertarians believe in free trade -- that we should legalize drugs -- that unions should not be government backed -- that we should remove government controls on businesses (including minimum wage) -- that government does not have the authority or ability to "take care" of people -- that government should provide civil rights sharing for any 2 people (even if not romantically joined). However, libertarians don't hate any group of people (except the powerful, willfully corrupt). If the working class actually believe a minimum wage increase is in their best interests, libertarians believe it is our responsibility to educate them, not hate and want to eliminate them. That's partially how the Eugenics movement started.

Posted by mandyAmanda at 5:39 PM on Nov 06, 2009 | Report this comment

If only Republicans would drop their moronic anti-gay schtick and liberals who believe in state control of business would be stoned to death the world would be a better place. I support capitalism and gay marriage. And I hate with a passion unions and the working class. Why not re-direct all the hate that people put toward gays (who don't deserve it) and send it to the working class (who are too stupid to do anything productive)? Think about how much better we would all feel and how much better the world would be.

Posted by AntiNeoFascist at 3:55 PM on Nov 06, 2009 | Report this comment

"All of these things have occurred under a capitalist society. I will not say that it is a true free market society, but it is a capitalist society." Capitalism cannot (or should not) simply be defined as private ownership of means of production and the profit from it. I would argue, as would many, that we no longer live in a capitalist society, but a meld of corporatism/fascism/socialism. When government rules, requirements, policies, regulations and laws are passed either in favor of certain businesses at the expense of others, or in an effort to mandate good behavior and restrict bad, the "free" part of free market is lost. This has been growing since the 1800s in the US. Ask most any business owner (small or large) and they'll tell you how many seemingly arbitrary rules and regulations must be followed. Whenever someone says that we're moving toward socialism, some argue "The government isn't trying to own businesses." But they're missing the point, is it really necessary for government to *own* businesses and run them if they can simply pass rules, codes, regulations, policies, requirements, mandates, decrees, directives, orders, edicts, restrictions, limits, laws and define whatever required processes and procedures they wish that the businesses must follow, under threat of penalty? Pass enough of those over time and government can virtually control business, while still blaming any failures on the businesses themselves (or, as in this case, on capitalism itself).

Posted by RC at 2:13 PM on Nov 06, 2009 | Report this comment

This is childish and what can be expected from a student. Get in the real world first and then tell me you can't chase your American Dream. In fact I would argue that right now you have started and probably started some time ago as a free individual. I hope at some point you diecided grades matter and you deicded college matters. If smart, you choose a field of study that will give you opporutnities to pursue your dream. If you aren't then why blame it on me and take my liberties because of your failure to act. Ugh. I beleive in freedom of choice. I should be left to choose to support your sorry theories or not and choose to give money (taxes) to support those individuals that will not (I didn't say cannot) do so for themselves.

Posted by Cal at 12:18 PM on Nov 06, 2009 | Report this comment

Well put Waddell, and I do the same. I watch Glenn Beck every now and then because its good to know the enemy


Email

Your Name: *
Your Email: *  
To Email: *  
Subject: IDSnews.com | Capitol change
Comments:
Verify image: Security Text



*