The Wedding Planner

I can find a few reasons why you shouldn't waste your money on "The Wedding Planner". First, guys pay attention, this is a chick flick. Second, this is a really bad chick flick. Next, the only reason a girl wants to waste your money on the movie is so she can drool over Matthew McConaughey for 110 minutes. And finally, everyone's favorite fly-girl, Jennifer Lopez, is not enough eye-candy to make the crap that is called "The Wedding Planner" worth watching.\nLopez plays Mary Fiore, General Patton reincarnated as a hot wedding planner, who, despite her awesome looks, hasn't had a date in two years (yeah, right). She then meets pediatrician Steve Edison (McConaughey, whose hair looks like it was styled by sticking his finger in an electric socket) and starts to fall for him when she discovers he is the groom in her latest wedding gig. McConaughey and Lopez then spend the rest of the movie figuring out love, and their possible futures, while planning the wedding.\nEvery pivotal, high-emotion point in the movie is shown in the previews. In fact the only thing that fills the movie that wasn't in the previews is boring crap. The jokes are horrible, and only minutely funny. If you saw the trailer, you saw the movie.\nLopez and McConaughey give decent performances, but they both play cute very well. In fact McConaughey plays cute so well he gets girls so hot in their pants they think the movie is actually good, when in fact, they're just excited over a guy. \n"The Wedding Planner" is horrible. Any girl that likes this movie deserves to be dumped by their boyfriend for stupidity. My girlfriend (who eroticaly moans when she sees McConaughey) put her lust aside to admit "The Wedding Planner" really wasn't that good. \nHere's an idea. Watch the previews for "The Wedding Planner". Then go spend your money on a good movie, like "Finding Forrester". Both you and your girlfriend will be pleased with Sean Connery's excellent performance.