Bush adviser: Public not misled about Iraq war

WASHINGTON -- While admitting "we were wrong" about Iraq's weapons of mass destruction, President Bush's national security adviser rejected assertions Sunday that the president manipulated intelligence and misled the American people.\nBush relied on the collective judgment of the intelligence community when he determined that Iraq's Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction, national security adviser Stephen Hadley said.\n"Turns out, we were wrong," Hadley told "Late Edition" on CNN. "But I think the point that needs to be emphasized ... allegations now that the president somehow manipulated intelligence, somehow misled the American people, are flat wrong."\nRepublican lawmakers and other officials who appeared on Sunday news shows echoed Bush's Veterans Day speech in which he defended his decision to invade Iraq.\nBush said Democrats in Congress had the same intelligence about Iraq, and he argued that many now claiming the information had been manipulated had previously supported going to war. The president also accused his critics of making false charges and playing politics with the war.\nDemocratic Party Chairman Howard Dean rejected the criticism Sunday and said, "The truth is, the president misled America when he sent us to war."\nAppearing on NBC's "Meet the Press," the party chairman disputed Bush's claim that Congress had the same information -- the president withheld some intelligence and some caveats about it, Dean said -- and that two commissions had found no evidence of pressure being placed on those within the intelligence community.\nIn fact, Dean said, how the administration handled the intelligence it received has yet to be determined by a Senate committee.\nContending that the president has not been honest about the size of the deficit as well as the war, Dean said, "This is an administration that has a fundamental problem telling the truth."\nHadley said Bush received dissenting views about the accuracy of intelligence and relied on the collective judgment of the intelligence community as conveyed by the CIA director. The national security adviser criticized those who continue to claim Bush manipulated the intelligence and made misleading statements.\n"It is unworthy and unfair and ill-advised, when our men and women in combat are putting their lives on the line, to relitigate an issue which was looked at by two authoritative sources and deemed closed," he said. "We need to put this debate behind us."\nSen. John McCain, R-Ariz., said Democrats have a right to criticize the war but that it was disingenuous to claim Bush lied about intelligence to justify it.\n"Every intelligence agency in the world, including the Russians, the French ... all reached the same conclusion," McCain said on CBS' "Face the Nation."\nIn a column for The Washington Post, former Sen. John Edwards, D-N.C., said he was wrong to have voted to give Bush the authority to go to war and called the intelligence on which he made that decision "deeply flawed and, in some cases, manipulated to fit a political agenda."\n"The information the American people were hearing from the president -- and that I was being given by our intelligence community -- wasn't the whole story," wrote Edwards, the Democratic nominee for vice president in 2004. "Had I known this at the time, I never would have voted for this war."\nHadley said issues about the accuracy of U.S. intelligence have not impaired the administration's ability to pursue its policies regarding the nuclear programs of Iran and North Korea.\n"We've been able to move our diplomacy forward at the same time we're taking the steps we need to do to improve our intelligence," he said.\nWhen asked why people should believe U.S. claims about the nuclear plans of Iran given the failure of intelligence about Iraq, Hadley said there has been international consensus about Iran.