Jury opens deliberation to rule on Moussaoui's fate

ALEXANDRIA, Va. -- Monday afternoon Zacarias Moussaoui's fate was placed in the hands of a jury that will decide whether he is executed for his part in the deaths of Sept. 11, 2001.\nJurors opened deliberations at 2:26 p.m. EDT, after final pleadings from the prosecution to "put an end to his hatred and venom" by opting for execution, and from the defense to spare him the martyr's death he seeks and send him to prison for life instead.\nThe jury decided in 15 hours of deliberations during four days earlier this month that Moussaoui, 37, the only man charged in this country in the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks, was responsible for deaths that day even though he was in jail at the time. That qualified him for the death penalty. The question now before jurors is whether he deserves it.\nMoussaoui had been unrepentant throughout a legal drama that included a virtually unprecedented Internet-era multimedia presentation that recreated for the jury the last half-hour on Flight 93, which crashed in Pennsylvania on Sept. 11 as passengers overwhelmed hijackers, and gripping first-person accounts of suffering.\nMoussaoui has publicly relished the results of the attacks, mocked victims and their families, insulted his lawyers and yet insisted he did not want to die. During a recess in closing arguments, Moussaoui said: "Our children will carry on the fight."\nAs he left the courtroom, he raised his hands in the air, smiling, and clapped as if he'd finished watching a performance.\nU.S. District Judge Leonie Brinkema commended both sides for their handling of the difficult case and singled out the burden of the defense lawyers in having to represent someone who rejected them at every turn. "There never has been a defendant as difficult as this one," she said, "who did everything he could to undermine your efforts."\nAfter the jury left, defense lawyers tried once more to have the death penalty stricken from the case, based on their inability to put direct questions to witnesses held elsewhere as enemy combatants.\nBut Brinkema dismissed that motion, agreeing with the prosecution that the issue had already been decided by an appeals court.\nProsecutor David Raskin urged the jurors to reject defense arguments that Moussaoui is mentally ill and to brush off any hesitation that they would be giving him what he wants by deciding on execution. "He wants you to think Osama bin Laden will be mad at us," Raskin said. "Do you think Osama bin Laden gives a damn about what happens here? ... That is a joke."\nThe prosecutor pointed out how Moussaoui rejoiced in the deadly outcome of the attacks. "The defendant rejoices in all that pain," he said. "He loved it because he was responsible for it. He loved it because it meant to him, mission accomplished."\nDefense lawyer Gerald Zerkin countered that Moussaoui's contempt for the victims and the trial "is proof that he wants you to sentence him to death. He is baiting you into it. He came to America to die in jihad and you are his last chance."\nZerkin said the jury can instead "confine him to a miserable existence until he dies and give him not the death of a jihadist ... but the long slow death of a common criminal."\nZerkin also asked jurors to keep an eye on history, noting that even in the Nuremberg trials after World War II, only 11 death sentences were handed out for "the worst atrocities in the history of man."\nHe said Moussaoui is "a veritable caricature of an al-Qaida terrorist" and "the only al-Qaida operative inept enough to be captured before 9-11."\n"This is about history, it is about how our justice system responded to the worst terrorist attack on our soil," Zerkin said.\nDuring his presentation, prosecutor David Novak replayed some of the horrific photos and videos that jurors had seen during witness testimony, including a burned body in a wrecked Pentagon office and body parts at the base of the World Trade Center.\n"If not this case, then when is a death sentence appropriate?" he asked. "How many people have to die?"\nMoussaoui's wishes are irrelevant, Novak told the jury. "Nothing in the jury instructions will tell you to try to figure out what the defendant wants and give him the opposite."\nThe defense had presented evidence of Moussaoui's shattering treatment as a child born in France of Moroccan descent, of his father's and uncle's violence in his home and of mental illness rampant in his family.\nRaskin said none of that excused his conduct and he rejected the defense argument that Moussaoui is a schizophrenic.\n"Just because we can't comprehend this kind of evil, doesn't mean he suffers a mental illness," he said. "We will never understand evil like this."\nAssociated Press writer Michael J. Sniffen contributed to this report.