Duke DA apologizes to lacrosse players after pursuing case for year

DURHAM, N.C. – The local prosecutor who charged three Duke lacrosse players with raping a stripper apologized to the athletes Thursday and said the North Carolina attorney general’s decision to drop the case was right.\n“To the extent that I made judgments that ultimately proved to be incorrect, I apologize to the three students that were wrongly accused,” Durham County District Attorney Mike Nifong said.\nOn Wednesday, Attorney General Roy Cooper not only dropped all remaining charges against the players Reade Seligmann, Collin Finnerty and David Evans, but pronounced them innocent and said they were the victims of Nifong’s “tragic rush to accuse.” Cooper branded Nifong a “rogue” prosecutor who was guilty of “overreaching.”\n“I have every confidence that the decision to dismiss all the charges was the correct decision based on that evidence,” Nifong said.\nIn what appeared to be a plea to the athletes not to take any further action, such as a lawsuit, he said: “It is my sincere desire that the actions of Attorney General Cooper will serve to remedy any remaining injury that has resulted from these cases.”\nNifong refused to answer any questions after handing the statement to an Associated Press reporter outside his office in Durham.\nSeligmann’s attorney, Jim Cooney, responded bitterly to the apology.\n“You can accept an apology from someone who knows all the facts and simply makes an error,” Cooney said. “If a person refuses to know all the facts and then makes a judgment, that’s far worse – particularly when that judgment destroys lives.”\nNifong stressed that it was own decision to remove himself from the case that gave Cooper’s office the opportunity to review the evidence against the athletes.\n“If I did not want to subject ... my own performance to such scrutiny – if, in other words, I had anything to hide – I could have simply dismissed the cases myself,” he said. “The fact that I instead chose to seek that review should, in and of itself, call into question the characterizations of this prosecution as `rogue’ and `unchecked.’”\nFinnerty’s father, Kevin Finnerty, said Nifong’s “attempt at an apology” was “disengenuous and insincere.”\n“It falls well short of whatever it might take to even remotely repair the damage he has inflicted on so many people,” Finnerty said.\nWhen asked if he accepted the apology, Finnerty said: “I do not. Too little, too late.”\nEvans’ attorney, Joseph Cheshire, accused Nifong of engaging in “revisionist history” with his statement.\n“It’s not an apology. It’s an excuse. It’s an attempt at an excuse,” Cheshire said. “It’s not an acceptance of responsibility. It’s a self-serving attempt to excuse bad behavior.”