Vick indicted in dogfighting ring

RICHMOND, Va. – When a Bad Newz Kennels dog was wounded in a losing fight, NFL star Michael Vick was consulted before the animal was doused with water and electrocuted.\nThat’s just one of the gruesome details that emerged Tuesday when the Atlanta Falcons quarterback and three others were indicted by a federal grand jury.\nThe four were charged with competitive dogfighting, procuring and training pit bulls for fighting and conducting the enterprise across state lines.\nThe 18-page indictment, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, alleged the 27-year-old Vick and his co-defendants began the dogfighting operation in early 2001, the former Virginia Tech star’s rookie year as the No. 1 overall pick.\nThe operation was centered at a property Vick owned in Surry County, where a fence shielded prying eyes from the back, and the two-story brick home was surrounded by fencing in the front, with several black buildings further back.\nUnlike previous documents, which did not name Vick, the indictment is littered with his name, including this tidbit – Vick was known as “Ookie” in the dogfighting world.\nIf convicted of all the charges, Vick and the others – Purnell A. Peace, 35, of Virginia Beach; Quanis L. Phillips, 28, of Atlanta; and Tony Taylor, 34, of Hampton – could face up to six years in prison, $350,000 in fines and restitution..\nWhile the Falcons and the NFL said little Tuesday, John Goodwin of the Humane Society of the United States said the details were especially troubling.\nAbout eight young dogs were put to death at the Surry County home after they were found not ready to fight in April 2007, the indictment said. They were killed “by hanging, drowning and/or slamming at least one dog’s body to the ground.”\n“Some of the grisly details in these filings shocked even me, and I’m a person who faces this stuff every day,” Goodwin said. “I was surprised to see that they were killing dogs by hanging them, and one dog was killed by slamming it to the ground. Those are extremely violent methods of execution – they’re unnecessary and just sick.”\nPurses for the fights ranged from hundreds of dollars to the thousands, and participants and spectators often placed side bets on the outcome, according to the indictment.\nAfter two Bad Newz Kennels dogs lost fights in March 2003, the indictment alleged Vick gave a bag containing $23,000 to the owner of the winning dogs.\nVick and the Falcons are due to report to training camp July 25.\n“Obviously, we are disturbed by today’s news,” the team said in a statement posted on its Web site, apologizing to fans for the negative publicity. “We will do the right thing for our club as the legal process plays out. We have a season to prepare for.”\nVick and the others are accused of “knowingly sponsoring and exhibiting an animal fighting venture” and conducting a business enterprise involving gambling, as well as buying, transporting and receiving dogs for the purposes of an animal fighting venture.\nThe indictment said dogfights were held at the Virginia property owned by Vick and dog owners brought animals from six states, including New York and Texas.\nLocal authorities have been investigating since an April 25 drug raid at the property. On June 7, officials with the Department of Agriculture with help from state police executed their own search warrant and found the remains of seven dogs.\nSurry County prosecutor Gerald G. Poindexter said he didn’t know of the indictment before it was filed, and said he’s not sure how the county will continue its separate case.\nAt the start, authorities seized 66 dogs, including 55 pit bulls, and equipment commonly used in dogfighting. About half the dogs were tethered to car axles with heavy chains that allowed the dogs to get close to each other, but not to have contact – an arrangement typical for fighting dogs, according to the search warrant affidavit.\nBefore fights, participating dogs of the same sex would be weighed and bathed, according to the filings. Opposing dogs would be washed to remove any poison or narcotic placed on the dog’s coat that could affect the other dog’s performance.\n– Associated Press Writer Dionne Walker contributed to this report.